One minute of audio and ten minutes of audio. Which is easier to start practicing with today? Shortness is appealing, but there are things playback length alone won't tell you. One minute where unfamiliar topics come one after another and ten minutes where one person explains a familiar subject likely trip you up in different places.
Rather than dismissing material with the single word "difficult," let's look at it from five perspectives. This is not an ability assessment that assigns scores, but a checklist suggestion from the editorial team for matching audio to today's purpose.
First, is the topic familiar?
The first is familiarity with the topic. Read the title or summary and see whether you can say in a phrase, in your own language, what it's about. This isn't to avoid unfamiliar fields. It's to separate how much you can anticipate from where you'll need to learn something new.
The British Council's explanation of listening describes understanding that draws on background knowledge and context, and understanding that recognizes words from sound. Knowing the background and hearing every sound are different things. Even so, material where a scene comes to mind just from the title is one option.
Look at voices and words separately
The second is the number of speakers and overlapping voices. Not just how many people there are, but whether you can follow whose turn it is. Even with two people, if they often talk at the same time, you'll observe it differently than a single person's explanation. Don't decide pass or fail by headcount from the start; listen briefly to the section you want to use and check.
The third is vocabulary. If there's a transcript, read a short paragraph and check "Can I explain what happened?" rather than "Are there words I don't know?" If you don't understand the terms central to the story, you may need to check their meaning before repeating the audio many times.
The guide here isn't the number of unknown words. Even with the same three unknown words, what you do next differs depending on whether they're three people's names or a verb that determines the conclusion you don't understand.
Sound conditions and ways to check
The fourth is sound quality. Are background noise behind the voice, quiet recording, or volume differences making the words hard to follow? Before deciding it's a problem with your own listening, also check your playback environment in a safe place. We don't choose on the basis that turning the volume up will solve it.
The fifth is supporting information such as transcripts, summaries, and exercises. The British Council's LearnEnglish Podcasts officially states that it provides transcripts and exercises. If you shortlist material with somewhere to check like this, you can decide even "what to look at after I didn't understand." Whether there's a transcript alone doesn't determine how easy the audio is.
Comparing two fictional materials
Material A is a one-minute roundtable on a new product. Three voices overlap, there are many product names, and there's only a summary. Material B is a ten-minute cooking introduction. One person explains the steps in order, and there's a transcript. Both are setups made for comparison, not evaluations of real programs.
If you "want to check one step in the order of work," the first step of B could be a candidate. If you "want to observe turn-taking in conversation," an exchange in A with little overlap is a candidate. You don't need to tackle all ten minutes, nor understand the whole minute.
Before choosing, a memo of just five lines: topic, voices, vocabulary, sound quality, supporting information. For each, write a word for "what I know" and "not yet checked." Finally, add one thing you want to check today. Alongside the playback length, you'll start to see which part you'll actually work on.
Related article: How to use podcasts for language learning
